Search for: "USCA JUDICIARY"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
The LAT story continues: In a letter sent to Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
"The American people deserve better than this unprecedented partisan obstruction of the President's efforts to ensure a fair and functioning judiciary," White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler said in the statement.The "unprecedented" claim is, of course, nonsense. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:22 am
Circuit.But just the opposite was true when the Senate Judiciary Committee met Tuesday to hear from Neomi Rao, the D.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am
., USCA, 11-4283-cvThe U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Further, said the court, "the judiciary has the inherent power to prevent any actual impairment of its independence created by the collective bargaining process. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
Supreme Court ruled that Congress cannot expand the authority of the judiciary beyond the constraints of the Eleventh Amendment by adopting laws pursuant to the Indian Commerce Clause. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer holding a term appointment from his… [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:55 am
Summarily terminating a federal officer holding a term appointment from his or her positionPHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, USCA District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #15-1177NYPPL earlier summarized the decision in PHH Corporation v Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a decision in which the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit [Docket #15-1177] considered the issue of summarily removing a public officer holding a term… [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Ernst believed that the only way to defend Ulysses was to “…convince the government to declare the Ulysses a modern classic” (Birmingham, p. 297); there is an exemption for classics in the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1305). [read post]
